Throughout this article prepared by the Boorman Lawyers - Traffic Law division we explore in great detail the various penalties, fines and sentences that are available at the Court’s disposal for pleas or findings of guilt for alcohol related traffic offences in New South Wales. We explain what the Local Court can do, how disqualification works, where the Alcohol Interlock program fits in, and how penalties increase significantly if you are facing a second or subsequent “major offence” within five years.
Throughout much of the Western world drink driving and other serious alcohol related traffic offences are among some of the most common criminal offences that appear before the Courts on a daily basis. Australia, and specifically the state of New South Wales, is not immune from this. As a result, the Local Courts in NSW see more alcohol related traffic matters than almost any other criminal category. These offences are often committed by people who are otherwise of good character with little or no prior record. However, even for first offenders, the Courts repeatedly stress that these offences remain extremely serious because they expose innocent members of the public to danger and can cause serious injury, death and long-term trauma.
In the news, we see almost daily examples of death, carnage and tragedy caused by drink driving offences. NSW has deliberately imposed some of the harshest penalties in Australia for drink driving, with the stated aim of both punishing offenders and deterring others from similar risky behaviour. The NSW Parliament and the Courts have signalled that community protection and deterrence are key priorities in sentencing for drink driving, especially for Mid Range PCA, High Range PCA, and Refuse/Fail Breath Analysis matters.
Below is a detailed outline of the penalties, disqualification periods (minimum and maximum), Alcohol Interlock requirements and possible prison terms that the Court may impose. These sentencing options apply to the most common PCA ranges, Refuse/Fail offences and DUI charges in New South Wales. You should treat this as a guide only and seek personalised legal advice before you plead in Court. We routinely appear in Local Courts throughout NSW and can help you prepare your case, your references and your submissions for sentencing.
| Offence / Reading | First Offence vs Second Offence | Maximum Fine | Maximum Jail | Minimum Disqualification (DQN) | Maximum Disqualification (DQN) | Interlock Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Range PCA (0.150 or higher) |
First offence | $3300 | 18 months | 6 months | 9 months | 24 months |
| Second offence | $5500 | 2 years | 9 months | 12 months | 48 months | |
| Mid Range PCA (0.08 – < 0.15) |
First offence | $2200 | 9 months | 3 months | 6 months | 12 months |
| Second offence | $3300 | 12 months | 6 months | 9 months | 24 months | |
| Low Range PCA (0.05 – < 0.08) |
First offence | $2200 | Nil | 3 months | 6 months | N/A |
| Second offence | $3300 | Nil | 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| Special Range PCA (0.02 – 0.05) |
First offence | $2200 | Nil | 3 months | 6 months | N/A |
| Second offence | $3300 | Nil | 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| Novice Range PCA (0.00 – < 0.020 where zero limit applies) |
First offence | $2200 | Nil | 3 months | 6 months | N/A |
| Second offence | $3300 | Nil | 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| Refuse / Fail Breath Analysis or Blood Sample | First offence | $3300 | 18 months | 6 months | 9 months | 24 months |
| Second offence | $5500 | 2 years | 9 months | 12 months | 48 months | |
| Driving Under the Influence (DUI) (Alcohol or Drug) |
First offence | $3300 | 18 months | 6 months* | 9 months* | 24 months* |
| Second offence | $5500 | 2 years | 9 months* | 12 months* | 48 months* |
* Alcohol ONLY DUI offences are generally subject to mandatory interlock orders in NSW. Interlock means you are disqualified, and then instead of immediately getting a normal licence back, you must drive only with an approved Alcohol Interlock device fitted to your vehicle for a set period.
The figures shown above (fines, jail, disqualification and Interlock) reflect the sentencing tools available to the Court. They are not guaranteed outcomes. The Court will look at your blood alcohol reading, whether this is your first offence or you have previous “major offences” in the last five years, whether anybody was injured, whether there was a crash, your level of cooperation with police and your personal situation (work, dependency on a licence, rehabilitation, character references and so on). This is why legal preparation is critical before you appear in a NSW Local Court for drink driving or DUI.
Novice Range drink driving or DUI typically applies to people who are required to have a zero blood alcohol limit. That will usually include Learner and Provisional drivers who are expected to drive with no alcohol whatsoever in their system. Even though the reading itself is low, the Court treats these matters as serious because novice drivers have less driving experience and any alcohol in their system is considered to significantly increase the risk on NSW roads. Disqualification, a fine and a recorded conviction are all common unless the Court is persuaded to deal with the matter by way of a non-conviction order (often called a “Section 10”).
Special Range applies to “special category” drivers such as professional drivers carrying passengers for reward, drivers of heavy vehicles exceeding 13.9 tonnes GVM, certain commercial drivers and in some cases supervisors of Learner drivers. The Court sees these drivers as having a higher duty of care to the public. Even a relatively low reading can produce a conviction, a fine and a period of disqualification. Courts repeatedly state that the community must be protected from commercial or heavy vehicle drivers who drive after drinking.
Low Range is one of the most common categories to appear before the NSW Local Courts. A typical first offender with a Low Range reading will still face a fine, a period of licence disqualification and a criminal conviction unless the Court considers the matter trivial or at the very lowest end of objective seriousness, supported by strong subjective material. Sometimes, with excellent preparation and genuine mitigating circumstances, a person can ask the Magistrate to exercise discretion and impose a non-conviction outcome, avoiding disqualification and a recorded conviction. That is not automatic. It is something that must be earned in Court with evidence and submissions.
Middle Range drink driving is considered dangerous and high-risk. Courts frequently note that a driver in this range is “moderately affected by intoxicating liquor” and presents a real danger to others on the road. The potential for jail starts to become a live option, especially for repeat offenders, for those who caused or risked harm, or for drivers who behaved poorly with police. Lengthy disqualification and Interlock restrictions are common and the ability to argue for a non-conviction outcome becomes very limited.
High Range PCA offences (0.150 BAC or greater) are among the most serious alcohol-related traffic offences in NSW. Courts view High Range offenders as posing a very serious and immediate danger to the public. The higher the reading, the more aggravated the case is considered to be. Long licence disqualification, heavy fines, mandatory Interlock, community-based supervision orders and even full-time imprisonment are all possible sentencing outcomes. For second or subsequent High Range matters, or where there is a crash or other aggravation, jail becomes a very real risk. Magistrates in NSW have repeatedly said that High Range PCA offenders will be dealt with “harshly and swiftly.”
Some drink driving offences in NSW do not fall neatly into a specific PCA range. A common example is Driving Under the Influence (DUI) under Section 112 of the Road Transport Act 2013. DUI cases often arise where police cannot obtain a reliable breath or blood test result, but they allege that you were clearly intoxicated or otherwise impaired by alcohol or drugs at the time you were driving or attempting to drive.
The wording of the law under Section 112 (Use or attempted use of a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or any other drug) effectively says:
(1) A person must not, while under the influence of alcohol or any other drug: (a) drive a vehicle, or (b) occupy the driving seat of a vehicle and attempt to put the vehicle in motion, or (c) being the holder of a driver licence (other than a provisional licence or a learner licence), occupy the seat in or on a motor vehicle next to a holder of a learner licence who is driving the motor vehicle.
(2) If a person is charged with an offence under subsection (1): (a) the allegation can say the person was under the influence of more than one drug and still not be considered uncertain or “duplicity”, and (b) the offence is proved if the Court is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant was under the influence of either a particular drug listed or a combination of those listed drugs.
The offence of DUI differs from driving with a PCA reading because DUI is usually proven through police and witness evidence — for example: the smell of intoxicating liquor, slurred speech, red or glazed eyes, swaying or being unsteady on your feet, involvement in a crash or dangerous incident, or incoherent behaviour suggesting serious impairment. Police will rely on their observations and experience to prove intoxication if they cannot present a formal BAC result from a breath analysis.
There is also a specific offence for refusing or failing to submit to a roadside breath test when lawfully required to do so. Under the Road Transport Act, Section 16(1)(a) provides that a person must not, when required by police, refuse or fail to submit to a breath test in accordance with directions. This usually occurs before the formal breath analysis stage. Even at this early roadside stage, refusing to provide a proper sample can lead to being charged.
The offence recognises that police use the roadside breath test to determine whether a driver may be over the limit and to justify detaining that person for a formal, more accurate breath analysis. If you refuse even to participate in the preliminary test, you are frustrating that lawful process and you can be charged with Refuse Breath Test.
Refusing or failing to submit to a formal breath analysis is treated even more seriously than refusing the initial roadside test. Section 16(1)(b) of the Road Transport Act says that a person must not refuse or fail to submit to a breath analysis in accordance with a lawful police direction. Usually, police will offer you multiple attempts — commonly three attempts — to provide a sufficient sample. If you refuse or fail to provide that sample, you can expect to be charged with Refuse (or Fail) Breath Analysis.
This charge is sentenced in NSW in a way that is comparable to High Range PCA. Courts view refusal or failure to provide a valid analysis sample as an attempt to avoid proper measurement of your blood alcohol concentration. As a result, penalties include heavy fines, lengthy disqualification, mandatory Interlock and in repeat or aggravated matters, the real possibility of imprisonment. Magistrates routinely stress that you cannot simply refuse an analysis in the hope of avoiding evidence.
There is also an offence for Wilfully Alter Blood Alcohol Concentration. This offence captures behaviour where a person, after driving, deliberately consumes additional alcohol or takes some other step to change or mask their true BAC before police can test them. For example, someone crashes a car, then quickly drinks alcohol at home and later claims they were sober at the time of the crash — they only drank “afterward”.
The law aims to stop people from gaming the system by making it unclear what their BAC truly was at the time they were driving. Courts treat this conduct as extremely serious. It is often sentenced on the same level of seriousness as High Range PCA, Refuse Breath Analysis or other major alcohol-related offences, because it is seen as a deliberate attempt to obstruct justice and undermine road safety enforcement.
You must understand that if you have been convicted of a “major offence” within the last five years, the Court is required to sentence your new drink driving matter more harshly. The increase in penalties is mandated by law. Magistrates do not have the discretion to simply ignore those elevated penalties when they apply. This means that fines go up, disqualification periods go up, Interlock periods go up and the likelihood of a jail sentence also increases, particularly for serious categories such as High Range PCA, Refuse Breath Analysis or DUI with aggravating features.
The Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) defines what is considered a “major offence”. Without reproducing the entire statute word for word, major offences generally include serious drink driving and drug driving related charges, dangerous or menacing driving offences, negligent driving causing death or grievous bodily harm, and offences such as Refuse Breath Analysis or Wilfully Alter BAC. Put simply, if you have been found guilty of one of these serious offences and you are back before the Court within five years, you are treated as a repeat offender and the penalties escalate sharply.
Examples of offences typically considered “major offences” include: Novice Range PCA, Special Range PCA, Low Range PCA, Middle Range PCA, High Range PCA, Drive with the presence of drugs in oral fluid, blood or urine, Driving Under the Influence of drugs or alcohol, Negligent driving, Dangerous, furious or reckless driving, Drag racing, Menacing driving, Refuse Breath Analysis, Failure to stop and assist after an impact causing injury, Refusing or preventing the taking of blood/breath samples, Wilfully altering the concentration of alcohol or drugs.
As noted above, if you have a “major offence” on your record within five years, the penalty ranges in Court for the new matter jump substantially. This is why you should never assume that a plea of guilty to a first offence “doesn’t matter”. It may matter a great deal if you ever find yourself in trouble again within five years because the second appearance can trigger mandatory higher penalties. It is critical to understand your exposure before pleading.
As you can see from the penalties and sentencing options above, there is a lot to understand when you are charged with drink driving or another serious alcohol related traffic offence in New South Wales. The offences are common, the Courts deal with them every single day, and the penalties can be harsh. Losing your licence, being placed on an Interlock order, receiving a criminal conviction, and even going to jail are real possibilities that can disrupt your employment, your ability to care for family and your entire lifestyle.
For that reason, you should speak to an experienced NSW or Sydney DUI lawyer before you go to Court. Proper preparation can include gathering strong character references, evidence of your employment or family responsibilities, proof of counselling or treatment, proof of completion of a traffic offender program and submissions explaining why you are unlikely to re-offend and why the Court should consider leniency. We appear daily in Local Courts across New South Wales and Queensland and we can assist you in preparing to achieve the most favourable outcome that is realistically available to you in the circumstances.
Boorman Lawyers regularly appears in NSW Local Courts on drink driving, PCA, DUI, Refuse Breath Analysis and related alcohol driving offences. We travel, we appear by video where permitted, and we brief experienced court advocates. You do not need to face sentencing alone.
For urgent advice: Call 1300 941 900 or contact us via our online enquiry form to discuss: saving your licence, minimising your disqualification period, what Interlock will mean for you, realistic sentencing outcomes based on your reading and history, and whether a non-conviction disposition (often called a “Section 10”) is even possible in your case.
This page is general information only and is not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts, background and level of seriousness. You should obtain tailored legal advice before entering a plea or appearing in Court.
High Range drink driving (0.150 BAC or higher) is considered extremely serious in NSW. You are looking at the possibility of a very large fine, a lengthy period of licence disqualification, a mandatory Alcohol Interlock order once you are allowed to drive again, and in more serious or repeat matters, the real risk of imprisonment. Courts say High Range offenders present a major danger to the community and must be dealt with firmly to protect the public and deter others.
Yes. Jail is a live option particularly for Mid Range and High Range PCA matters, Refuse or Fail Breath Analysis, and for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) where there are aggravating features such as a crash, passengers at risk, or a bad prior history. If you are facing a second or subsequent “major offence” within five years, the likelihood of jail increases. You should get legal advice before sentencing so you understand your real risk level and what you can do to mitigate it.
An Alcohol Interlock order is a court order that requires you to fit an approved breath-testing device to any vehicle you drive after your disqualification period. You must blow into the interlock to prove you are alcohol-free before the car will start. Interlock is commonly mandatory for High Range PCA, certain Mid Range and repeat matters, and alcohol-only DUI offences. It is designed to protect the community while still allowing limited, supervised driving for work and family commitments.
Yes. NSW law treats you as a repeat offender if you have a previous “major offence” in the last five years. That triggers higher maximum fines, longer mandatory disqualification, longer Interlock periods and a greater risk of jail. Magistrates have far less flexibility in these situations because the law requires harsher penalties for second and subsequent offences, particularly in High Range, Mid Range, DUI and Refuse Breath Analysis matters.
Most first-time Low Range PCA offenders should expect a fine, a criminal conviction and a period of disqualification. In limited cases with strong subjective material (excellent character, genuine remorse, urgent need for a licence, completion of a traffic offender program and no aggravating features) it may be possible to ask the Court to deal with the matter without recording a conviction, without a fine and without mandatory disqualification. This outcome is often informally called a “Section 10”. It is discretionary and absolutely not guaranteed.
Expert legal guidance for all NSW traffic law matters
Experienced legal professionals committed to achieving the best outcomes for our clients
Dedicated focus on traffic law and DUI cases with proven results
Immediate legal assistance when you need it most
89% success rate in DUI cases with hundreds of Section 10 dismissals
One-on-one attention and customized legal strategies for your case
Clear, upfront legal costs with no hidden fees
Convenient offices in Brisbane, Gold Coast, and Sydney
Watch exclusive behind-the-scenes footage and case studies from actual DUI court proceedings across NSW and QLD
See what our clients have to say about their experience with Boorman Lawyers
My expectations were exceeded, with my representation by Boorman Lawyers. Especially Mr Josh Boorman. Your advice and help far surpassed the goal. Your kindness, respectfulness, and Integrity, went the extra mile.
Dan
Facebook Review
I'm so glad I did! I was granted a section 10 which was the best possible outcome in my case. Josh was extremely patient, helpful and professional. He was always there to go through any questions or concerns I had.
Rosemary
Google Reviews
The most professional people, provided full ongoing support, they brought me the best outcome in court, despite my very serious matter. JOSH not only looks after his clients on a professional aspect but also aids in breaking up the personal stress and trauma the client is in.
Shubham
Google Reviews
I would highly recommend Boorman Lawyers. Josh was the perfect example as to why you should get a lawyer, right from the start he took the stress away, had all paperwork and advice needed spot on, even down to the finer details that can affect an outcome.
Dave
Google Reviews
Both Josh and Matt were efficient, professional and very knowledgeable. They kept me updated and made a very stressful situation a lot easier. Would highly recommend to anyone. Thank you so much.
Bianca
Google Reviews
Great service and affordable pricing. Always available to take my calls and answer all my questions. Will definitely use them again if I ever need a lawyer. Highly recommend!
Michelle
Google Reviews
I was very pleased with the result I got from Boorman Lawyers. Josh made me feel very comfortable and explained everything well. He was very easy to talk to and got me the best possible outcome.
Sarah
Google Reviews
My expectations were exceeded, with my representation by Boorman Lawyers. Especially Mr Josh Boorman. Your advice and help far surpassed the goal. Your kindness, respectfulness, and Integrity, went the extra mile.
Dan
Facebook Review
I'm so glad I did! I was granted a section 10 which was the best possible outcome in my case. Josh was extremely patient, helpful and professional. He was always there to go through any questions or concerns I had.
Rosemary
Google Reviews
The most professional people, provided full ongoing support, they brought me the best outcome in court, despite my very serious matter. JOSH not only looks after his clients on a professional aspect but also aids in breaking up the personal stress and trauma the client is in.
Shubham
Google Reviews
I would highly recommend Boorman Lawyers. Josh was the perfect example as to why you should get a lawyer, right from the start he took the stress away, had all paperwork and advice needed spot on, even down to the finer details that can affect an outcome.
Dave
Google Reviews
Both Josh and Matt were efficient, professional and very knowledgeable. They kept me updated and made a very stressful situation a lot easier. Would highly recommend to anyone. Thank you so much.
Bianca
Google Reviews
Great service and affordable pricing. Always available to take my calls and answer all my questions. Will definitely use them again if I ever need a lawyer. Highly recommend!
Michelle
Google Reviews
I was very pleased with the result I got from Boorman Lawyers. Josh made me feel very comfortable and explained everything well. He was very easy to talk to and got me the best possible outcome.
Sarah
Google Reviews
Search for your NSW courthouse below
Get expert legal advice from experienced professionals - Call now for immediate assistance
Brisbane, QLD 4000
Gold Coast, QLD 4217
Sydney, NSW 2000
We attend all courthouses in QLD & NSW
Monday - Friday:
8:30am - 6:00pm
Saturday - Sunday:
Closed
Call now for urgent legal matters. We're here to help when you need us most.
Boorman Lawyers Pty Ltd - Ph: 1300 941 900
OFFICE MEETING BY APPOINTMENT ONLY - Mail to: PO Box 7065 GCMC QLD 9726
Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation. Legal practitioners employed by Boorman Lawyers Pty Ltd are members of the scheme.
The information published on this webpage should not be taken as legal advice rather it should be considered for information purposes only. Boorman Lawyers accept no responsibility or liability for the use of information, material or external resources provided for on this webpage.