High Range Drink Driving at Tweed Heads Local Court — A Real Case With a BAC of 0.157

We recently represented a 45-year-old client at Tweed Heads Local Court on a high range drink driving charge. He had been stopped at a random breath testing checkpoint on the Pacific Highway on a Saturday evening and returned a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.157 — just above the high range threshold in New South Wales. He was shaken. He had never been in trouble with the law before, and the reality of potentially losing his licence, his livelihood, or even his freedom hit him hard.

Despite the seriousness of the charge, we achieved a result that kept our client out of prison, significantly reduced his disqualification period, and allowed him to begin putting this behind him. In this article, we walk through what happened, how high range drink driving works under NSW law, what we did to prepare for court, and the outcome the Magistrate delivered.

Watch the full case breakdown below, then keep reading for a detailed look at the law, the preparation, and what this means if you are facing a similar charge.

In New South Wales, drink driving offences are categorised by your BAC level. A reading of 0.150 or above falls into the high range category — the most serious tier of prescribed drink driving charges under the Road Transport Act 2013. For a first offender, the maximum penalties include a fine of up to $3,300, imprisonment of up to 18 months, and a mandatory licence disqualification of between 12 and 36 months.

That is the range the court was working with. Even at the lower end of high range — which is where our client’s reading of 0.157 sat — imprisonment is a real possibility. This is what makes high range charges so confronting for people who have never been through the court system before.

For second or subsequent high range offences, the stakes escalate further — fines up to $5,500, imprisonment of up to 24 months, and disqualification periods of three to five years. There are also mandatory interlock requirements that apply after the disqualification period ends.

The Challenges We Faced

We were upfront with our client about what he was up against. A BAC of 0.157 is above the high range threshold, and courts treat these matters seriously regardless of whether it is a first offence. The statutory minimum disqualification alone is 12 months — there is no getting below that for a high range charge.

Tweed Heads Local Court sits right on the NSW-Queensland border and services the broader Tweed region, including Kingscliff and Murwillumbah. The Magistrates there are experienced with drink driving matters and apply NSW sentencing law consistently. They see a lot of these cases, and they know the difference between genuine mitigation and someone going through the motions.

Our challenge was to demonstrate convincingly that our client’s reading — while objectively serious — reflected a one-off lapse driven by personal circumstances, not a pattern of reckless behaviour. We needed the court to see the person behind the number.

How We Prepared for Court

Given the severity of the charge, we built a comprehensive mitigation package designed to give the Magistrate every reason to exercise discretion at the lower end of the sentencing range.

Early guilty plea

With a confirmed breath analysis reading, there was no realistic prospect of contesting the charge. We advised our client to enter an early guilty plea at the first mention. This served two purposes — it demonstrated genuine acceptance of responsibility, and it attracted a sentencing discount that the court factors into the final outcome.

Character references

We gathered comprehensive character references from his employer, colleagues, family, and community contacts. Each reference spoke to his reliability, his standing in the community, and the fact that this offence was completely inconsistent with the person they knew. His employer also provided a letter confirming his ongoing employment and the impact that an extended disqualification would have on his ability to fulfil his professional responsibilities.

Mental health evidence

This was a critical piece of the case. Our client had been experiencing depression and stress in the period leading up to the offence, and alcohol had become a coping mechanism. We obtained evidence of his engagement with counselling and mental health services — not as an excuse, but to show the court that this was a situational lapse with a clear explanation, and that our client was already taking steps to address the underlying issues.

Pre-sentence report

We arranged for a pre-sentence report through Probation and Parole, which assessed our client as a low to moderate risk of reoffending. Combined with his clean record and his proactive engagement with support services, this report supported our argument that a custodial sentence was neither necessary nor proportionate.

We also prepared detailed written submissions on sentencing principles, drawing on relevant case authority to argue that the combination of a clean record, genuine remorse, mental health context, and strong community ties justified a sentence well below what the statutory maximum would allow.

The Outcome at Tweed Heads Local Court

The Magistrate acknowledged the seriousness of the offence and the prescribed sentencing range. However, the court found that our mitigation material was compelling. The Magistrate specifically noted the absence of any prior offences, our client’s immediate acceptance of responsibility through the early guilty plea, his engagement with mental health support, the strength of the character evidence, and the pre-sentence report’s assessment of low reoffending risk.

The result: no imprisonment. The court imposed a $3,000 fine and a 9-month licence disqualification.

To put that in context — the statutory minimum disqualification for a first high range offence in NSW is 12 months, and the maximum is 36 months. A 9-month disqualification sits below the minimum prescribed range, which reflects the court’s view that the exceptional mitigating circumstances in this case warranted a departure from the standard sentencing framework. The fine of $3,000 was also in the lower half of the available range (up to $3,300).

Our client was visibly relieved. The weight of the past few months — the charge, the uncertainty, the fear of prison — lifted. He could keep his job, continue his treatment, and move forward with his life. It was the best outcome we could have realistically hoped for given the reading.

What This Means If You Are Facing a High Range Charge in NSW

Every case turns on its own facts, and no one can guarantee a particular outcome. But this case highlights several things that consistently matter in high range drink driving matters before the Local Court.

Your personal circumstances carry real weight

Courts do not treat every offender the same. A first-time offender with a clean record, genuine remorse, and evidence of proactive rehabilitation presents a very different case than someone with prior convictions or aggravating behaviour. The mitigation package you present matters — often more than people realise.

Mental health context is relevant

If there are underlying mental health issues that contributed to the offence, courts will consider that. It does not excuse the behaviour, but it can explain it and support the argument that this was a one-off lapse rather than a reflection of the person’s character. Evidence of treatment and engagement with support services strengthens this significantly.

An early guilty plea makes a difference

Where the evidence is clear, entering a guilty plea at the earliest opportunity demonstrates acceptance of responsibility and attracts a sentencing discount. Delaying a plea that is ultimately inevitable gains nothing and can actually work against you.

Preparation before the court date is critical

Character references, employer letters, counselling evidence, pre-sentence reports — all of these need to be organised and ready before you walk into court. Magistrates notice the difference between someone who has genuinely engaged with the process and someone who turns up unprepared.

If you are facing a drink driving charge in NSW, getting proper legal advice early gives you the best chance of achieving a favourable result.

Frequently Asked Questions